On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 21:53 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 03/28/2013 09:41 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > > > > You don't need a new glibc port, you need a new klibc or musl port. > > > > http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2012/07/08/1 > > > > Way less work than getting glibc working for your basic smoketest... > > > > Good point. Average time to port klibc to a new architecture is about > four hours as long as the person porting knows the calling conventions > and assembly language involved. > > -hpa > > Thanks for the suggestion. Too bad we don't have in-house expert in klibc and musl port. Hi HPA, I knew you are the developer of klibc. Do you have any documentation to port a new architecture and also how to replace glibc with klibc in build? By the way, klibc or musl is easier to port? Thanks. Regards lftan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
