Re: [RFC PATCH (resend)] block layer zero-copy: missing access_ok() check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Linus Torvalds (torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > get_user_pages() does check permissions. It looks up the vma and
> > checks them there, which is much more than access_ok() ever does.
> 
> To clarify: the fact that a vma exists at all already means "it's a
> user mapping" (with the special gate area being a secondary user
> mapping). So you don't need any kind of explicit user check.

Ah! That's the bit I was missing.

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux