[PATCH 4/4] UAPI: Fix endianness conditionals in M32R's asm/stat.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In the UAPI header files, __BIG_ENDIAN and __LITTLE_ENDIAN must be compared
against __BYTE_ORDER in preprocessor conditionals where these are exposed to
userspace (that is they're not inside __KERNEL__ conditionals).

However, in the main kernel the norm is to check for "defined(__XXX_ENDIAN)"
rather than comparing against __BYTE_ORDER and this has incorrectly leaked
into the userspace headers.

The definition of struct stat64 in M32R's asm/stat.h is wrong in this way.
Note that userspace will likely interpret the field order incorrectly as the
big-endian variant on little-endian machines - depending on header inclusion
order.

[!!!] NOTE [!!!]  This patch may adversely change the userspace API.  It might
be better to fix the ordering of st_blocks and __pad4 in struct stat64.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc: linux-m32r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: linux-m32r-ja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---

 arch/m32r/include/uapi/asm/stat.h |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/m32r/include/uapi/asm/stat.h b/arch/m32r/include/uapi/asm/stat.h
index da4518f..98470fe 100644
--- a/arch/m32r/include/uapi/asm/stat.h
+++ b/arch/m32r/include/uapi/asm/stat.h
@@ -63,10 +63,10 @@ struct stat64 {
 	long long	st_size;
 	unsigned long	st_blksize;
 
-#if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
+#if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN : defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
 	unsigned long	__pad4;		/* future possible st_blocks high bits */
 	unsigned long	st_blocks;	/* Number 512-byte blocks allocated. */
-#elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
+#elif defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN : defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
 	unsigned long	st_blocks;	/* Number 512-byte blocks allocated. */
 	unsigned long	__pad4;		/* future possible st_blocks high bits */
 #else

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux