On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 21:51 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > Hi Michel, > Yes.. I don't think we can avoid that. Moreover, since we _want_ unfair > reader/writer semantics to allow flexible locking rules and guarantee > deadlock-safety, having a recursive reader side is not even an issue, IMHO. Recursive unfair reader lock may guarantee deadlock-safety, but remember, it adds a higher probability of live-locking the write_lock. Which is another argument to keep this separate to cpu hotplug only. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
