On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:48:19 +0900, Alex Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/06/2013 02:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > > This looks like it is preserving this userspace-sensitive semantic > > so that dynamically added chips will still get the same assigned > > numbers. > > It does (it should, at least), the assigned ranges should be strictly > identical to the previous version. While testing I also made sure all > chips had the same GPIO range. > > > But I want some guarantees, so state clearly in the commit > > that any dynamically assigned chip will get the same base > > address after this change as it got before it, and please take > > this opportunity to add a comment stating that this search > > method is vital for userspace ABIs, and must be preserved. > > Done. I will take the blame if something goes wrong. :) Applied, thanks g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
