On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Re-implement gpiochip_find_base using the list of chips instead of the > global gpio_desc[] array. This makes it both simpler and more efficient, > and is needed to remove the global descriptors array. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> So Haojian just submitted a different patch to the same piece of code staring to search for GPIO number in ascending order instead, but I NACKed it. This looks like it is preserving this userspace-sensitive semantic so that dynamically added chips will still get the same assigned numbers. But I want some guarantees, so state clearly in the commit that any dynamically assigned chip will get the same base address after this change as it got before it, and please take this opportunity to add a comment stating that this search method is vital for userspace ABIs, and must be preserved. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
