On 19/01/13 05:55, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:55:07AM +0000, James Hogan wrote: >> Hi Stephen, Al, >> >> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 +0000 James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch >>>> of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and >>>> GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal). >>> >>> OK, but I hope you mentioned not rebasing to Al. >> >> I'm still rebasing the metag tree, and it's not quite ready for -next so >> I don't mind if Al's tree rebases at this stage tbh. >> >> Al: I don't know if you normally rebase your tree, but if it's okay with >> you I'll let you know when I need it not to be rebased. > > Umm... > 1) #master is definitely bad for base; #for-linus is much safer (and > sufficient for your case) Thanks for that, and I see it's now merged into Linus' tree so I'll rebase onto that instead. Cheers James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
