On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:55:07AM +0000, James Hogan wrote: > Hi Stephen, Al, > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 +0000 James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch > > > of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and > > > GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal). > > > > OK, but I hope you mentioned not rebasing to Al. > > I'm still rebasing the metag tree, and it's not quite ready for -next so > I don't mind if Al's tree rebases at this stage tbh. > > Al: I don't know if you normally rebase your tree, but if it's okay with > you I'll let you know when I need it not to be rebased. Umm... 1) #master is definitely bad for base; #for-linus is much safer (and sufficient for your case) 2) I'm a couple of fix folds away from opening #no-rebase (and yes, it'll be a superset of #for-linus) FWIW, I'd suggest a rebase on top of signal.git#for-linus. Noting in the stem is visibly relevant in your case, AFAICS... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
