On 01/11/12 15:39, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:14:12PM +0000, James Hogan wrote: >> The metag architecture doesn't have a PC RTC or implement the RTC >> interface that genrtc expects, so add METAG to the list of architectures >> not to build RTC or GEN_RTC on. >> >> Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/char/Kconfig | 5 +++-- >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/Kconfig b/drivers/char/Kconfig >> index ea6f632..09b64a8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/char/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig >> @@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ if RTC_LIB=n >> config RTC >> tristate "Enhanced Real Time Clock Support (legacy PC RTC driver)" >> depends on !PPC && !PARISC && !IA64 && !M68K && !SPARC && !FRV \ >> - && !ARM && !SUPERH && !S390 && !AVR32 && !BLACKFIN && !UML >> + && !ARM && !SUPERH && !S390 && !AVR32 && !BLACKFIN \ >> + && !UML && !METAG > > This is getting huge, would it be easier to reverse it and just list the > arches that it does work for? Hi Greg, Yes, I think I agree. I'll probably also squash together all these similar !METAG patches into one for v2. Thanks for taking a look James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
