On 06/05/2012 10:41 AM, Yong Zhang wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:37:39PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> On 06/04/2012 04:02 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>> However, I do want to emphasize that this isn't generic code. So how about >>>> an "arch_" prefix instead? Something like: >>>> arch_cpu_pre_starting(), arch_cpu_pre_online() and arch_cpu_post_online()? >>> >>> Yes, please. >> >> >> Sure, queued up for v2. (Atm, figuring out how to deal with xen (patch 5). Once >> that gets done, will post a v2.) > > Since there is dependency on ipi_call_lock cleanup patches > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133827595625509&w=2 > > So please feel free to include the patches into yours. > Sure, if that would help Thomas pick them up easily. > And It will be better that Thomas could pick them up :) > Yes :) Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat > >> >>> >>> Otherwise, thanks for that work! >> >> >> We are glad that it helps :-) >> >>> From the first glance, it's not >>> colliding much with the changes I have in the pipeline, but I will >>> have a closer look. >>> >> >> >> Great! Thanks a lot for your time, Thomas! >> >> Regards, >> Srivatsa S. Bhat >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html