On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:37:39PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > On 06/04/2012 04:02 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> However, I do want to emphasize that this isn't generic code. So how about > >> an "arch_" prefix instead? Something like: > >> arch_cpu_pre_starting(), arch_cpu_pre_online() and arch_cpu_post_online()? > > > > Yes, please. > > > Sure, queued up for v2. (Atm, figuring out how to deal with xen (patch 5). Once > that gets done, will post a v2.) Since there is dependency on ipi_call_lock cleanup patches http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133827595625509&w=2 So please feel free to include the patches into yours. And It will be better that Thomas could pick them up :) Thanks, Yong > > > > > Otherwise, thanks for that work! > > > We are glad that it helps :-) > > > From the first glance, it's not > > colliding much with the changes I have in the pipeline, but I will > > have a closer look. > > > > > Great! Thanks a lot for your time, Thomas! > > Regards, > Srivatsa S. Bhat > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Only stand for myself -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
