Re: Arch maintainers Ahoy!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:40 AM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Could you use cpu_to_be32/64() and then ffs()?  That ought to work for both
> variants of endianness.  The cpu_to_beXX() should be a noop on BE and is
> likely to be a single instruction on LE.  The meat of ffs() is usually a
> single instruction, though it may have to have zero-detect logic added.

First off, the *last* thing you want to do is go to big-endian mode.
All the bit counting gets *much* more complicated, and your argument
that it's "free" on some architectures is pointless, since it is only
free on the architectures that have the *least* users.

Secondly, it's not "likely a single instruction" on LE, neither is
ffs. It can be, but it's often one of the slower instructions.

Many architectures will have - but only in their most recent uarch
versions - popcount or similar, and if you're little-endian, that
would be what you want. Except we already figured out faster versions
for little-endian based on multiplication or a few add/shift
operations.

                        Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux