Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] x86/tlb: optimizing flush_tlb_mm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Now IF you're going to change the tlb interface like this, you're going
> to get to do it for all architectures, along with a sane benchmark to
> show its beneficial to track ranges like this.
> 
> But as it stands, people are still questioning the validity of your
> mprotect micro-bench, so no, you don't get to change the tlb interface.


Yes, sure. You are definitely right!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux