Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] x86/tlb: optimizing flush_tlb_mm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:24 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:

> Sorry. I don't understand what's the comments Peter's made days ago. I should ask for more details originally. 
> 
> So, Peter, the correct change should like following, am I right?
> 
> -#define tlb_flush(tlb) flush_tlb_mm((tlb)->mm)
> +#define tlb_flush(tlb, start, end) __flush_tlb_range((tlb)->mm, start, end)

No.. the correct change is to do range tracking like the other archs
that support flush_tlb_range() do.

You do not modify the tlb interface.

Again, see: http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=129952026504268&w=2


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux