On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 07:01:46AM +0400, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > I was thinking about your suggestion. We are speaking about the same > problem but different solutions. Let me summarize shortly why I came > up with current solution: I don't think there is a problem here. I think there's just redundant code in every arch apart from Sparc. > * leaving check in arches make them isolated, so > mm->get_unmapped_area could be called safely anywhere (currently it > is done in hugetlb and get_fb_unmapped_area stuff) Right. So is get_fb_unmapped_area() called without first going through get_unmapped_area() ? As far as I can see, it isn't. Same for hugetlbfs. I don't think you've analysed the issue you are trying to address correctly. As such I will *not* be giving you an ACK for your current changes to arch/arm. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
