Re: [PATCH 0/6] get rid of extra check for TASK_SIZE in get_unmapped_area

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 06:40:16PM +0400, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> From: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail>
> 
> The current get_unmapped_area code calls the f_ops->get_unmapped_area or
> the arch's one (via the mm) only when check for TASK_SIZE is passed. However,
> generic code and some arches do the same check in their a_g_u_a implementation.
> 
> This series of patches fix the check order for TASK_SIZE in archs'
> get_unmapped_area() implementations, and then removes extra check in
> high-level get_unmapped_area().

Do we even need this check in arch code?  AFAICS it's already checked in
get_unmapped_area(), and this will be called prior to any
arch_get_unmapped_area() implementation.  Given that this is a potential
security issue, please check my analysis of this.

unsigned long
get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
		unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
{
	...
	/* Careful about overflows.. */
	if (len > TASK_SIZE)
		return -ENOMEM;

	get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
	if (file && file->f_op && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
		get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux