On 30/04/12 08:51, Al Viro wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:34:13PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 20:45, Al Viro<viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The only comment I have,
38671a3e831ed7327affb24d715f98bb99c80e56 m68k: add TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME and handle it
forgets to unexport do_signal().
Meh... ??The thing is, there are _two_ of them. ??signal_mm.c and signal_no.c
badly need merging, with common stuff moved to signal.c. ??I really hate
Greg recently posted a patch to merge them:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-m68k/msg04995.html
Nice... BTW, could you comment on
m68k: don't open-code block_sigmask()
m68k: use set_current_blocked in sigreturn/rt_sigreturn
m68k-nommu: do_signal() is only called when returning to user mode
m68k: add TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME and handle it.
in signal.git tree? The last one is really interesting...
Just pick the current tree - one that was there yesterday had a dumb typo
in thread_info.h part, so it wouldn't even compile (TIF_NOTIFE_RESUME
defined instead of TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME ;-/)
BTW, Greg's patch put into the queue in the very beginning, everything rebased
on top of it.
Those changes currently sitting in your signal tree look ok to me.
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
