On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 20:45, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The only comment I have, > >> 38671a3e831ed7327affb24d715f98bb99c80e56 m68k: add TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME and handle it > >> forgets to unexport do_signal(). > > > > Meh... ??The thing is, there are _two_ of them. ??signal_mm.c and signal_no.c > > badly need merging, with common stuff moved to signal.c. ??I really hate > > Greg recently posted a patch to merge them: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-m68k/msg04995.html Nice... BTW, could you comment on m68k: don't open-code block_sigmask() m68k: use set_current_blocked in sigreturn/rt_sigreturn m68k-nommu: do_signal() is only called when returning to user mode m68k: add TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME and handle it. in signal.git tree? The last one is really interesting... Just pick the current tree - one that was there yesterday had a dumb typo in thread_info.h part, so it wouldn't even compile (TIF_NOTIFE_RESUME defined instead of TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME ;-/) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
