On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:17:50 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 00:32, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:40:32 +0200 > > Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 13:26, Konstantin Khlebnikov > >> <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Even if CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=n gcc genereates code for some VM_BUG_ON() > >> > >> That's because of the side effects of the expression > >> > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/25/146 > >> > >> But IRIC, we do want them here? > >> > > > > AFAICT (lkml.org appears to be having a meltdown), you've gone and > > linked to this very thread. > > > > Please try again, this time avoiding hyperlinks ;) > > Yeah, I noticed after the fact. I wanted to look up the definition of > unused_expression(), which obviously wasn't in my tree yet ;-) > > Still, I think people started relyong on the side effects, didn't they? I hope not. If they are, they snuck it past me cleverly! A quick grep of mm/*.c looks clean. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
