On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 00:32, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:40:32 +0200 > Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 13:26, Konstantin Khlebnikov >> <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Even if CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=n gcc genereates code for some VM_BUG_ON() >> >> That's because of the side effects of the expression >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/25/146 >> >> But IRIC, we do want them here? >> > > AFAICT (lkml.org appears to be having a meltdown), you've gone and > linked to this very thread. > > Please try again, this time avoiding hyperlinks ;) Yeah, I noticed after the fact. I wanted to look up the definition of unused_expression(), which obviously wasn't in my tree yet ;-) Still, I think people started relyong on the side effects, didn't they? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
