On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:06:01 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/06/2012 02:05 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> > >>> hm, I'm surprised that we don't have a zero-returning implementation of > >>> is_compat_task() when CONFIG_COMPAT=n. Seems silly. Blames Arnd. > >> > >> There is > > > > I can't find it. The definition in include/linux/compat.h is inside > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT. > > > > I thought Linus globalized it very recently... Oh, yeah, I misread. We should be able to remove quite a few open-coded ifdefs now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
