On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Kautuk, > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:44, Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> did you get a chance to review this patch ? > > Yes, I've just did. Sorry it took that long. No problem. > Looks good, so > Acked-by: <Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > BTW, what's the plan with this series? Will you take care of it, or should > all arch maintainers take their parts? > Uh .. I didn't really think much about that as I'm quite new to this. :) It would be nice if everyone(including you) could just include their respective patches in their trees/branches. >> can I improve this patch in any way ? > > There are a few more or less minor things: > - You can remove "write" completely, as it's now superseded by > FAULT_FLAG_WRITE in "flags", > - Please also port the comments that were added to x86. They make > life easier for the casual reader. > should I send another patch for this ? or do you want me to make a v2 of this patch and send it you today ? > Thanks! > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
