Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This hunk will conflict with "[PATCH] rework smp code" in the linux-next > tree. The sigp.h header is disintegrated as well.. > But except for this little hiccup I like the idea to split system.h, > makes a lot of sense. I've just posted a new version of my patchset that reverses the order of the patches to put the arch-specific bits first. Each arch-specific bit is a stand-alone reduction of that asm/system.h to just a bunch of #includes which is deleted by the final patch (except where asm-generic/system.h is involved). As these are independent, it would, for example, be possible to just take the s390 one into your tree and merge it with your changes. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
