On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 17:53 -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, James Bottomley wrote: > > > I think it's probably a compiler bug. gcc isn't as adept with section > > annotations as people think it is. This tends to manifest in the > > non-x86 toolchains because we tend to be using earlier versions. > > > > It compiles fine with my cross-compiler using gcc-4.5.1. So it's a native toolchain bug in gcc ... the point still stands: there'll be tons of these throughout non x86 tool chains. You can't break every arch under the sun just for a dubious mark stuff const. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
