Re: Please include const-sections into linux-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, James Bottomley wrote:

> It's not incredibly trivial: it causes a compile failure on parisc:
> 
> mm/percpu.c:1372: error: __setup_str_percpu_alloc_setup causes a section
> type conflict
> make[1]: *** [mm/percpu.o] Error 1
> 
> I have no idea why, though.
> 

Not sure why this would only happen on parisc, but I haven't looked at it 
closely.  It means something qualified with const is being defined in a 
section with other definitions that are not const, or vice versa.

For example:

	static int x __attribute__((__section__("foo"))) = 1;
	static const int y __attribute__((__section__("foo"))) = 2;

will result in the same error.  Since __setup_param() places 
__setup_str_percpu_alloc_setup in .init.rodata as const, it means 
something else has already been defined in .init.rodata without being 
qualified as such.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux