On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:08:49PM -0300, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Are you sure about enabling interrupts before going to "no_context" ? > > If somebody does a user access "in atomic" with interrupt disabled (with > the expectation that a fault would be caught by search_exception_tables > and returned as -EFAULT), such code probably doesn't expect interrupts > to be re-enabled implicitely. I hadn't considered that... I'll review this and make sure this isn't what we intended (it probably isn't) and get it fixed. Thanks, Richard Kuo -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
