Re: [patch v3 21/36] Hexagon: Add SMP support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:51:52AM -0300, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> And on the producer side, a spinlock for one or... that looks like wheel
> re-inventing to me :-)
> 
> In fact your bit iteration loop also re-invents find_*_bit interfaces.
> 
> Any reason why you don't simply use bitops or atomics here ?

No particular reason; just the way it turned out when I was getting things
working.  I'll get them cleaned up.


> Also what is your memory model ? ordered or weakly ordered ? Do you need
> some kind of memory barrier between setting ipi->bits and
> __vmintop_post() ?

Our model is ordered, so there's no need for a barrier there yet.


Thanks,
Richard Kuo


-- 

Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux