On 11-08-11 12:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:09, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> On 11-08-07 10:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> Blackfin is broken because of this. a simple grep of the tree >> >> I've run all the in-tree blackfin configs, so it is all good. > > so you made a change and it's all good <now> ? Correct. > >> Have you thought about getting at least one blackfin defconfig in >> the linux-next build coverage? Gives you a better chance of >> having people see when they've broken it. > > all of the blackfin defconfigs get tested nightly in linux-next by an > ADI build machine. i just didnt have a chance to review the logs as i > was traveling. That is good, but as you've noted, it isn't something that anyone else can see when they are combing the normal linux-next build results below looking to see if they broke anything. http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ Thanks, Paul. > -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
