Re: [concept & "good taste" review] persistent store

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > - for OOPS messages will not cause system panic, it will go to disk and
> > > will not use up the persistent storage.
> > 
> > You can't guarantee that an oops didn't just kill your ability to actually
> > write your syslog to disk or out across the network.
> 
> I do not need to guarantee that. If the OOPS message can not be written
> to disk, just keeping it in persistent storage, and that is the very
> value of persistent storage.  But for OOPS can go to disk safely, we do
> not need to waste persistent storage for it.

My point is how do you know an oops message will actually manage to get to
disk?  There's a userspace program (syslogd) between the kernel log and the
disk or network.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux