On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Guan Xuetao wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-arch-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-arch- > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Gleixner > > Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 9:50 PM > > To: Tejun Heo > > Cc: Guan Xuetao; Arnd Bergmann; linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 000/211] unicore32 architecture support Please fix your mail client to do proper citations. A single line On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote: or whatever your preferred cite line is, is sufficient. We all have the mail header already. > > It's ok to have several patches ordered by topics > > > > - generic header stuff > > - processor and system headers > > - low level entry and setup code > > - process/thread related code > > - mm related code > > - timers > > - interrupts > > - ptrace > > - signals > > - fault handling > > - misc > > - build system, main makefile, Kconfig > > > > That makes it actually feasible to review. > Thanks, > I will rearrange my patches. And please mail them to yourself before you post them and make sure they apply and resemble exaclty what you wanted to send. I just noticed, that your mailer line-wrapped the patches: + /* + * actually the registers should be pushed and pop'd conditionally, but + * after bl the flags are certainly clobbered + */ Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
