On Wednesday 08 December 2010, Guan Xuetao wrote: > > > @@ -0,0 +1,390 @@ > > > +/* 0 */ CALL(sys_restart_syscall) > > > + CALL(sys_exit) > > > + CALL(sys_fork_wrapper) > > > + CALL(sys_read) > > > + CALL(sys_write) > > > +/* 5 */ CALL(sys_open) > > > + CALL(sys_close) > > > > When you start using the generic unistd.h file, you can also replace this table > > with something like arch/tile/kernel/sys.c. > Well. I will use the generic unistd.h in UniCore-64 version. I thought you had agreed to break ABI compatibility with your existing code base and use the generic ABI everywhere. Did I misunderstand you or did you make up your mind since then? > > Hmm, when the architecture was being defined, why didn't you ask for a > > cycle counter? It really improves the delay code a lot. > No software readable cycle counter in UniCore32. > > > If you have a good time base by now, you should use it. Is the OST_OSCR > > something you could use here? > OST_OSCR is much coarse in here, which is 14.318M Hz. Ok, I see. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
