On Sunday 10 October 2010 17:07:26 Akinobu Mita wrote:
> Some architectures use spinlock to implement it
> (asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic.h). Most other architectures use
> test_and_set_bit() and test_and_clear_bit() as this patch shows.
>
> Why are there two implementations? test_and_{set,clear}_bit() are more
> costly operations than spinlock for some architectures?
I would guess that is only true on architectures that implement all atomics
using a hashed spinlock like cris, sparc32 or parisc. This way the user
can decide which spinlock to use rather than have the arch code calculate
a hash on the pointer.
This is an ext2 specific micro-optimization that I don't think makes
sense in the generic le bitops code.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
