Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> That would make things much cleaner and in fact move one large step >> toward being able to make powerpc virq scheme generic, which seems to be >> a good idea from what I've heard :-) > > Yep. I'm not certain about making the ppc virq scheme generic. Maybe it is just my distorted impression but I have the understanding that ppc irq numbers mean nothing and are totally unstable whereas on x86 irq numbers in general are stable (across kernel upgrades and changes in device probe order) and the irq number has a useful hardware meaning. Which means you don't have to go through several layers of translation tables to figure out which hardware pin you are talking about. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
