On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 23:18 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > plain text document attachment (powerpc-use-new-allocator.patch) > > Use the new functions and free the descriptor when the virq is > > destroyed. > > Looks ok as a first pass, but we should go further and replace the > allocator we have in powerpc to use yours instead. > > Then I should get rid of my big irq_map that maps virq to HW number & > domain pointers and instead put those in the irq data. Any objection to > me sticking some archdata there for that purpose ? No, though if we can avoid another void pointer and have a sensible data structure for it would be nice. > That would make things much cleaner and in fact move one large step > toward being able to make powerpc virq scheme generic, which seems to be > a good idea from what I've heard :-) Yep. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
