Re: [PATCH -tip -v4] irq_work: generic hard-irq context callbacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 17:10 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:29 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> >
> >> I uses the cross build tool from:
> >>
> >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
> >
> > I'm not familiar with those, I build my own gcc-4.5.1 toolchains for all
> > targets that would actually build a gcc toolchains, for those that don't
> > I simply don't care about.
> 
> I don't think it's a reasonable requirement to have every contributor
> compile on all architectures. If that was a general requirement
> soon nobody would send patches anymore.
> 
> Cross arch breakages happen rarely and can be usually repaired after
> the fact.

I think its reasonable to at least try and compile bits if you
explicitly touch these architectures like the patch under consideration
does.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux