On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On Don, 2010-08-19 at 14:59 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > If so, the warning seems valid as sizeof(struct page) is probably not > > > (always) a power of 2. On a native build on x86_64 it is 56 bytes > > > hereover. > > > Hmm .... > > > > gcc just generats a mull with inverted value. mull is cheap on any > > reasonable CPU. Please fix sparse. > > Not that I really know the code of sparse but what would be an > acceptable condition (except plain simply disabling/removing the warning > as such)? I think acceptable would be to warn if the type is variable sized (although I think gcc likely would error out in this case anyways) -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
