On Don, 2010-08-19 at 14:23 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > When I compiled allyesconfig'ed kernel with C=1, I got 1519 lines of
> > following message:
> >
> > include/linux/mm.h:599:16: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
> >
> > which is around 10% of total warnings. this was caused by page_to_pfn() macro
> > so I think it's worth to remove it by calculating pointer subtraction
> > manually.
>
> IMHO it would be better to simply disable the warning in sparse instead
> of uglying the code just to work around sparse bogosity. It doesnt' seem
> to make much sense. A subtraction followed by a shift is not expensive.
The code above is IMHO actually (the line with "return" in)
---- snip ----
static __always_inline void *lowmem_page_address(struct page *page)
{
return __va(PFN_PHYS(page_to_pfn(page)));
}
---- snip ----
If so, the warning seems valid as sizeof(struct page) is probably not
(always) a power of 2. On a native build on x86_64 it is 56 bytes
hereover.
Hmm ....
Bernd
--
mobile: +43 664 4416156 http://www.sysprog.at/
Linux Software Development, Consulting and Services
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
