On 2010-06-17 14:48, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 08:18:15 +0200 > Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 01 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 20:24:52 +0200 >>> Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, May 31 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>>>> This patchset removes useless ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD: >>>>> >>>>> - ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD is irrelevant to the majority of architectures but >>>>> they have to define it. >>>>> >>>>> - ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD definition is inconsistent on architectures; ISA >>>>> DMA addressing restriction, DMA addressing restriction or something >>>>> else. >>>>> >>>>> - Everyone (except for SCSI) uses dma_mask instead of ancient >>>>> ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD. >>>>> >>>>> Only SCSI uses ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD for ancient drivers with non-zero >>>>> unchecked_isa_dma. We can safely remove ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD usage in >>>>> SCSI. So we can clean up ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD on the whole tree. >>>> >>>> Looks good. James, it's probably easier if I just carry this patch set. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Any tree works for me, I thought about -mm though. >>> >>> Can you replace [1/3] with the following? >>> >>> I fixed the subject and the body, s/aha1532/aha1542/; >>> >>> Somehow I forgot to remove unused BAD_SG_DMA(). >> >> I'll collect the acks and include this update. > > Can you send this to -next via your tree? I want this to be > compile-tested on -next on various architectures. Yep, going out now. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
