On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 20:24:52 +0200
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 31 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > This patchset removes useless ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD:
> >
> > - ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD is irrelevant to the majority of architectures but
> > they have to define it.
> >
> > - ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD definition is inconsistent on architectures; ISA
> > DMA addressing restriction, DMA addressing restriction or something
> > else.
> >
> > - Everyone (except for SCSI) uses dma_mask instead of ancient
> > ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD.
> >
> > Only SCSI uses ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD for ancient drivers with non-zero
> > unchecked_isa_dma. We can safely remove ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD usage in
> > SCSI. So we can clean up ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD on the whole tree.
>
> Looks good. James, it's probably easier if I just carry this patch set.
Thanks,
Any tree works for me, I thought about -mm though.
Can you replace [1/3] with the following?
I fixed the subject and the body, s/aha1532/aha1542/;
Somehow I forgot to remove unused BAD_SG_DMA().
=
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] aha1542: remove ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD usage
We can safely remove ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD usage in aha1542. aha1542 uses
ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD to see if:
- the buffers in scatter/list are below 16MB.
- scsi_host is below 16MB.
Both checkings were added in the ancient times but aren't necessary
nowadays since we properly bounce the buffers and allocate scsi_host
below 16MB with non-zero unchecked_isa_dma.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/aha1542.c | 25 -------------------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aha1542.c b/drivers/scsi/aha1542.c
index 2a8cf13..4f785f2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/aha1542.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/aha1542.c
@@ -52,22 +52,6 @@
#define SCSI_BUF_PA(address) isa_virt_to_bus(address)
#define SCSI_SG_PA(sgent) (isa_page_to_bus(sg_page((sgent))) + (sgent)->offset)
-static void BAD_SG_DMA(Scsi_Cmnd * SCpnt,
- struct scatterlist *sgp,
- int nseg,
- int badseg)
-{
- printk(KERN_CRIT "sgpnt[%d:%d] page %p/0x%llx length %u\n",
- badseg, nseg, sg_virt(sgp),
- (unsigned long long)SCSI_SG_PA(sgp),
- sgp->length);
-
- /*
- * Not safe to continue.
- */
- panic("Buffer at physical address > 16Mb used for aha1542");
-}
-
#include<linux/stat.h>
#ifdef DEBUG
@@ -691,8 +675,6 @@ static int aha1542_queuecommand(Scsi_Cmnd * SCpnt, void (*done) (Scsi_Cmnd *))
}
scsi_for_each_sg(SCpnt, sg, sg_count, i) {
any2scsi(cptr[i].dataptr, SCSI_SG_PA(sg));
- if (SCSI_SG_PA(sg) + sg->length - 1 > ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD)
- BAD_SG_DMA(SCpnt, scsi_sglist(SCpnt), sg_count, i);
any2scsi(cptr[i].datalen, sg->length);
};
any2scsi(ccb[mbo].datalen, sg_count * sizeof(struct chain));
@@ -1133,16 +1115,9 @@ static int __init aha1542_detect(struct scsi_host_template * tpnt)
release_region(bases[indx], 4);
continue;
}
- /* For now we do this - until kmalloc is more intelligent
- we are resigned to stupid hacks like this */
- if (SCSI_BUF_PA(shpnt) >= ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "Invalid address for shpnt with 1542.\n");
- goto unregister;
- }
if (!aha1542_test_port(bases[indx], shpnt))
goto unregister;
-
base_io = bases[indx];
/* Set the Bus on/off-times as not to ruin floppy performance */
--
1.6.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
