Re: [patch 0/2] Run interrupt handlers always with interrupts disabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> As long as it's rare (which it is) i dont see a problem: you can enable 
> interrupts in the handler by using local_irq_enable(), like the IDE PIO 
> drivers do. That way it's documented a bit better as well, because it shows 
> the precise source of the latency, with a big comment explaining it, etc.

I don't think it's as rare as you think particularly in embedded, and the
moment you start explicitly using local_irq_enable() you've simply moved
the underlying problem back and made it far harder to grep for.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux