On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 10:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:06:44AM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > The following patch series removes the IRQF_DISABLED functionality > > > from the core interrupt code and runs all interrupt handlers with > > > interrupts disabled. > > > > As was covered in previous discussions, what about drivers such as SMC91x > > which take a long time to retrieve packets from the hardware? Always running > > handlers with IRQs disabled will kill things such as serial on these > > platforms. > > As long as it's rare (which it is) i dont see a problem: you can enable > interrupts in the handler by using local_irq_enable(), like the IDE PIO > drivers do. That way it's documented a bit better as well, because it shows > the precise source of the latency, with a big comment explaining it, etc. Or alternatively, use threaded interrupts for such slow hardware. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html