On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:11:13 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 15:56 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > I would like to merge the new support that depends on this in 2.6.32, > > > so unless there's major objections, I'd like this to go in early during > > > the merge window. We can sort out separately how to carry the patch > > > around in -next until then since the powerpc tree will have a dependency > > > on it. > > > > Can't see any problem with that. > > CC'ing Linus here. How do you want to proceed with that merge ? (IE. so > far nobody objected to the patch itself) > > IE. The patch affects all archs, though it's a trivial change every > time, but I'll have stuff in powerpc-next that depends on it, and so I'm > not sure what the right approach is here. Should I put it in the powerpc > tree ? > > I also didn't have any formal Ack from anybody, neither mm folks nor > arch maintainers :-) Well the change is trivial, it just adds another unused argument to the macros. For the records: it still compiles on s390. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
