On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 09:31 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > I have no problems with that. I'd always intended to have flags > go further up the call chain like Linus did (since we'd discussed > perhaps making faults interruptible and requiring an extra flag > to distinguish get_user_pages callers that were not interruptible). > > So yes adding more flags to improve code or make things simpler > is fine by me :) > That's before you see my evil plan of bringing the flags all the way down to set_pte_at() :-) Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
