Re: handle_mm_fault() calling convention cleanup..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sat, 4 Jul 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> BTW. I'd like to extend these if there's no objection one of these days
> to also pass whether it was an exec fault, and pass the full flags to
> ptep_set_access_flags().

Sure. No problem, and sounds sane.

Just a tiny word of warning: right now, the conversion I did pretty much 
depended on the fact that even if I missed a spot, it wouldn't actually 
make any difference. If somebody used "flags" as a binary value (ie like 
the old "write_access" kind of semantics), things would still all work, 
because it was still a "zero-vs-nonzero" issue wrt writes.

And there were cases in the hugepage handling that I had missed, that 
Hugh picked up. Maybe he picked them all - but be careful.

I didn't add any flags (like the FAULT_FLAG_RETRY thing that started it 
all) that would actually _require_ everybody to always treat it as a 
bitmask. And some places still pass the flags down as basically just the 
"write or not" thing. ptep_set_access_flags() stands out as one of them 
(and I think your suggestion would actually clean things up), but there 
are probably others.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux