Re: Microblaze noMMU/MMU merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Michal,

Michal Simek wrote:
I would like to say your opinion about putting together Microblaze MMU
arch to noMMU version.

In C code will be #ifdef CONFIG_MMU ... #endif  or #ifndef.

Here is proposal for headers. The similar style is used in m68k but I
would like to have the same code
for both archs in main file.

#ifndef _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PAGE_H
#define _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PAGE_H

code for noMMU and MMU which is the same for both.

#ifdef __uClinux__
#include "page_no.h" -> noMMU specific
#else
#include "page_mm.h"-> MMU specific
#endif
#endif /* _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PAGE_H */

Breaking up the files that way is really only temporary. They will
eventually all be merged back to single files (I have probably
reworked about 60% of them so far). There ends up being very little
difference.

I would keep single files if you could.

Regards
Greg


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St,                             FAX:         +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia         WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux