On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 12:23:40AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >This patch selects HAVE_GET_CYCLES and makes sure get_cycles_barrier() and >get_cycles_rate() are implemented. > >Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx> >CC: benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >CC: paulus@xxxxxxxxx >CC: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> >CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> >CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> >CC: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >--- > arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/powerpc/include/asm/timex.h | 11 +++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > >Index: linux.trees.git/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >=================================================================== >--- linux.trees.git.orig/arch/powerpc/Kconfig 2008-11-07 00:09:44.000000000 -0500 >+++ linux.trees.git/arch/powerpc/Kconfig 2008-11-07 00:09:46.000000000 -0500 >@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ config PPC > select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS if PPC64 > select USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS if SMP > select HAVE_OPROFILE >+ select HAVE_GET_CYCLES if PPC64 So maybe it's just me because it's Friday and I'm on vacation, but I don't see anything overly specific to ppc64 here. In fact, you use get_cycles_rate for all of powerpc in a later patch in the series. Is there something special about HAVE_GET_CYCLES that I'm missing that would make it only apply to ppc64 and not ppc32? josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
