Re: [RFC patch 15/15] LTTng timestamp x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 20 October 2008 04:29:07 pm H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > But it's not going to solve the "hey, I have 512 CPU's, they are all on 
> > different boards, and no, they are _not_ synchronized to one global 
> > clock!".
> > 
> > That's why I'd suggest making _purely_ local time, and then aiming for 
> > something NTP-like. But maybe there are better solutions out there.
> 
> At the same time, it would definitely be nice to encourage vendors of 
> large SMP systems to provide a common root crystal (frequency standard) 
> for a single SMP domain.  Preferrably a really good one, TCXO or better.

A single root crystal is nice for us software guys.  But it often
also turns into a single point of failure, which the hardware guys
are always trying to eliminate.  So I think multiple crystals are
inevitable for the really large machines.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux