Mathieu Desnoyers writes: > Do you know if mtfb implies an instruction synchronization (isync) ? I It doesn't. > think that if it does not, the new get_cycles_barrier() might have to be > used at some locations in the kernel code if more precise timestamp > order is required. OK. I'll let you figure out where. :) Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
