Re: RFC: remove ibcs2/PER_SVR4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 17:08 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> Doesn't look like it; all invocations of SET_PERSONALITY are passing 0 for
> the ibcs2 argument.  So I think the 2nd argument should go entirely.  MIPS
> segment against linux-next is below.  As you may notice it's actually a
> bug fix, there was a missing else statement that didn't bite bite anybody
> thanks to the unusedness :-)

Hmpf, yes, it is the second argument..

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux