On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:50:09AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Indeed that would be a good use for it if this general fallback mechanism > > were to be merged. > > Want me to rebase my virtualizable compound patchset on top of your vmap changes? Is there much clash between them? Or just the fact that you'll have to use vm_map_ram/vm_unmap_ram? I probably wouldn't be able to find time to look at that patchset again for a while... but anyway, I've been running the vmap rewrite for quite a while on several different systems and workloads without problems, so it should be stable enough to test out. And the APIs should not change. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
